This distorted image only serves

Attitudes toward war. While Russia is generally seen as stemming primarily from the dominance of liberal narratives in opposition media, only a well-educated and wealthy minority opposes Putin while the poor majority remain loyal consumers of propaganda. Surveys show this is a poor man's response to the war. Views are most critical. Researchers observed that low-income people were more worried about military action because they expected their material conditions to deteriorate further. among high-income respondents.

People expressed support for Putin's decision and only 10% opposed it. Only 10% of low-income respondents said they supported the invasion. There is no doubt that the real level of dissa Job Function Email List tisfaction with the invasion is much higher and will increase. The left wanted to show society, including the working class and poor, that it was not just pro-Western liberals led by the middle-class opposition who opposed the war.  the Kremlin's benefit as it attempts to portray the current conflict.




It is described as a collision of civilizations between Russia and the West's constant adversary and the establishment of a fifth column on Russian soil. It must be shown that the Russian workers have their own reasons for peace and that they are independent of the West. This peace does not mean a new national humiliation due to military defeat and the territorial division of Russia, but rather returns our country to its true masters, the majority of the working people. The left must fight against the collective guilt imposed on the people by some of Putin’s liberal critics. In the official position.

In the hands of party propaganda this became a very effective tool in rallying around the flag. The sad truth is that the war Putin started was not a random adventure. The history of the post-Soviet years has led us to this disaster. Great social inequalities became the basis for dictatorships because in addition to control over property the poorest majority also lost their political voice. Most of the regimes that came to power over the years on the ruins of the Soviet Union used disgraceful nationalist and xenophobic rhetoric.